In your book, you mentioned that "enlightenment is simply our natural state of "felt" oneness with Being and a state of "feeling-realization.”
Is enlightenment based on feeling rather than thinking? Help us understand who feels it and where it is felt.
Yes, well it is certainly closer to feeling than thinking. There is no word to describe the state of connectedness with Being.
I am putting together two words in the book: feeling and realization hyphenated. Because there is not a correct word that I can use. Language doesn't have a word for that. So I can only use something that gets relatively close but that's not it either. Realization sounds a little bit as if it were a "mental" thing. "Oh, I know." Feeling sounds as if it were an "emotion " But it is not an emotion. And it is not a mental recognition of anything.
Perhaps the word that is closest to it is the realization of stillness, which is when the mental noise that we call thinking, subsides. There is a gap in the stream of thought, but there is absolutely no loss of consciousness. In that ''gap" there is full and intense consciousness, but it has not taken on form.
Eckhart Tolle in a Daily Telegraph interview by John Parker (around the turn of the century?) – see HERE
The Book referred to is The Power of Now