What implications do Carl Rogers 19 propositions have for Human-centred education?

 

Carl Rogers - a founder of the humanistic approach to psychology - see WikiPedia article.

Carl Rogers - a founder of the humanistic approach to psychology - see WikiPedia article.

At some point, if it hasn’t already been done, someone should look at Carl Rogers’ ’19 propositions’ to see what implications they have for Holistic, Human-centred or Person-centred education;

 

The theory of Carl Rogers is considered to be humanistic and phenomenological. 

Nineteen Propositions

1 All individuals (organisms) exist in a continually changing world of experience (phenomenal field) of which they are the centre.

.

2 The organism reacts to the field as it is experienced and perceived. This perceptual field is “reality” for the individual.

.

3 The organism reacts as an organized whole to this phenomenal field.

.

4 A portion of the total perceptual field gradually becomes differentiated as the self.

.

5 As a result of interaction with the environment, and particularly as a result of evaluational interaction with others, the structure of the self is formed – an organised, fluid but consistent conceptual pattern of perceptions of characteristics and relationships of the “I” or the “me”, together with values attached to these concepts.

.

6 The organism has one basic tendency and striving – to actualize, maintain and enhance the experiencing organism.

.

7 The best vantage point for understanding behaviour is from the internal frame of reference of the individual.

.

8 Behavior is basically the goal directed attempt of the organism to satisfy its needs as experienced, in the field as perceived.

.

9 Emotion accompanies, and in general facilitates, such goal directed behaviour, the kind of emotion being related to the perceived significance of the behaviour for the maintenance and enhancement of the organism.

.

10 Values experienced directly by the organism, and in some instances are values introjected or taken over from others, but perceived in distorted fashion, as if they had been experienced directly.

.

11 As experiences occur in the life of the individual, they are either, a) symbolized, perceived and organized into some relation to the self, b) ignored because there is no perceived relationship to the self structure, c) denied symbolization or given distorted symbolization because the experience is inconsistent with the structure of the self.

.

12 Most of the ways of behaving that are adopted by the organism are those that are consistent with the concept of self.

.

13 In some instances, behaviour may be brought about by organic experiences and needs which have not been symbolized. Such behaviour may be inconsistent with the structure of the self but in such instances the behaviour is not “owned” by the individual.

.

14 Psychological adjustment exists when the concept of the self is such that all the sensory and visceral experiences of the organism are, or may be, assimilated on a symbolic level into a consistent relationship with the concept of self.

.

15 Psychological maladjustment exists when the organism denies awareness of significant sensory and visceral experiences, which consequently are not symbolized and organized into the gestalt of the self structure. 

.

16 When this situation exists, there is a basic or potential psychological tension.

.

17 Any experience which is inconsistent with the organization of the structure of the self may be perceived as a threat, and the more of these perceptions there are, the more rigidly the self structure is organized to maintain itself.

.

18 Under certain conditions, involving primarily complete absence of threat to the self structure, experiences which are inconsistent with it may be perceived and examined, and the structure of self revised to assimilate and include such experiences.

.

19 When the individual perceives and accepts into one consistent and integrated system all his sensory and visceral experiences, then he is necessarily more understanding of others and is more accepting of others as separate individuals.

.

20 As the individual perceives and accepts into his self structure more of his organic experiences, he finds that he is replacing his present value system – based extensively on introjections which have been distortedly symbolized – with a continuing organismic valuing process.

.

 

    Additionally, Rogers is known for practicing “unconditional positive regard,” which is defined as accepting a person “without negative judgment of …. [a person's] basic worth.”

    For much more about Carl Rogers go HERE

    Leave a Reply

    Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s